The Super Tuesday votes are in and (mostly) counted leaving the question – who won? The short answer is no one or maybe everyone (except Mitt Romney). For the long answer, read on.
Super Tuesday, the day in which nearly half of the states held primaries or caucuses, was as exciting and indecisive as most pundits predicted. Each of the five remaining major candidates won at least a handful of states.
On the G.O.P. side, where most of the media predicted that McCain would cement the nomination, the Arizona senator did have a good night. He’s come up a bit short on the delegate count, but big wins in big states in a three person race has got to have the senator feeling pretty good. But the McCain and the party should be concerned because McCain did not win in many states that the G.O.P. has much of a chance of winning. He fared poorly in the Republican strongholds of the Mountain West (where Romney did well – due to strong Mormon support) and especially the South (where Huckabee swept Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, West Virginia and his home state of Arkansas). McCain is sitting with more delegates than both of his opponents combined, but I imagine the party in particular is beginning to sweat a little.
On the Democratic side, things are much less clear. Both the Clinton and Obama camps can, and probably will, claim victory. Clinton won the big states and Obama won more of the small states and in most cases by a bigger margin. It’s not clear who won more delegates yet – I’ve seen different tallies on the BBC, CNN, New York Times and Fox News – but both campaigns have begun spinning the results. I must disclose that I’m not objective – see the sidebar on the right – but Obama’s strength in the South and Mountain West is an interesting result when considering a run against McCain in the general. If the Democrats were smart – not something the party is generally accused of – they would start to think about electability just about now. For the Democratic nominee to win in November they need to make inroads into those “red” states – the ones in which Obama is pulling in 60 plus percent of the vote.
If you’re tired of politics, I have bad news for you. If, like myself, you’re a bit of a political junky then that news is fantastic! The race continues, especially on the Democratic side. I can’t see Obama conceding or the formation of a so called unity ticket until a lot more votes are cast. Both Clinton and Obama are flush with cash and the primaries coming up are in the Midwest and the South, where Obama has had success. I suspect that buoyed by his wins in the South, Huckabee will keep the G.O.P. race interesting for a while as well. Hurrah for the U.S. election melodrama!
Finally, a bit of something that may get lost in the press accounts. My former temporary home state of Missouri has accurately picked the president in every election since 1956. They’ve not been perfect in the primaries – picking Gephardt on the Democratic side in 1988 and Buchanan on the Republican in 1996 – but are still considered one of the best presidential bellwethers. Winners last night: McCain and Obama.
Image credits:
Here are some nice interactive maps of the Republican and Democratic primary results.
Popularity: 6% [?]
Stumble Upon
Del.icio.us
Buzz















by courtney
06 Feb 2008 at 15:18
Hi Chris! I think you’re supposed to be interviewing me for The Great Interview Experiment. Just e-mail me at courtneycraig6@hotmail.com or stop by my blog and send me some questions! Thanks!
courtney’s last blog post..Vote Early And … Well, Just Once
by Jessica K
06 Feb 2008 at 16:13
Even though I’ve been voting for 11 years now, this is the first time I have actually paid attention to the whole process. I have to admit I’m a little bummed out this morning. I thought that today we would know for sure who the candidates were. Then I saw that some states don’t even hold primaries until May?! What is up with that? I have a strong hunch that MO is right. I’m calling it Obama and McCain.
Jessica K’s last blog post..A Very Merry Unbirthday
by Jason
06 Feb 2008 at 17:11
The Democrats should “start to think about electability just about now”? Wouldn’t this have been something to think about 6 months ago? Unfortunately I agree that it won’t happen now either because the average voter isn’t very smart. To prove my point, did you hear the stories about the crowds of people that were denied their vote in Texas? Turns out their primary isn’t until March 4th:
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/national/stories/020608dnpoldalvoters.368b228.html
They can’t figure out when to vote, so I’d say its safe to assume they’re not the most informed voters.
The good news about the split between Obama and Clinton is that my vote in Wisconsin on February 19th just might count for something!
by Nathan B.
06 Feb 2008 at 17:27
I thought it was interesting that Obama carried the two Northeast states that are home to the previous “experience” candidates, Dodd and Biden.
by Matthew
06 Feb 2008 at 18:32
Unless McCain does something stupid, or either Romney or Huckabee decide to drop from the race, I think McCain should feel real confident.
I agree that Obama has a better chance at winning an election against McCain. If this splitting the vote (and delegates) continue, the Dem nomination may end up being decided by the so call “Superdelegates” which are pick by neither candidate, but by the state party. Most reports have them leaning more towards Clinton.
http://slate.com/blogs/blogs/trailhead/archive/2008/02/06/learn-to-count.aspx
by turnbaby
06 Feb 2008 at 18:50
In checking the ever changing figures on the Missouri race I saw that the margin of ‘victory’ for Obama was less than 10,000 votes and they are splitting the delegates evenly. Interesting.
by Jason
06 Feb 2008 at 22:06
Delaware is northeast? It’s tucked right in there with Virginia and Maryland, and I wouldn’t have called those northeast either, but maybe that’s my northeastern bias.
Just because Dodd and Biden were the “experience” candidates, that doesn’t mean that Connecticut and Delaware were necessarily voting for experience. It’s not like they were nominated by their states to run for president. And even if experience was important, that would really only help McCain because none of the other candidates really have much true experience at the federal level.
The rallying cry of 2008: “Hope, Change! Change, Hope!”. Now if someone could throw in a few tears with those buzzwords. Or better yet, some substance.
by CDV
06 Feb 2008 at 23:13
Personally, I consider everything north of Jacksonville to be the Northeast.
Pingback
by UriShare - So who won?
07 Feb 2008 at 11:45
[...] So who won? Super Tuesday was all it was cracked up to be: exciting, chaotic and largely indecisive. Submitted: 1 minute ago Category: News Submitter: RssFeed Website: http://www.chrisdellavedova.com Report this link: Click here to report Comments: 0 [...]
by arizaphale
10 Feb 2008 at 16:31
OK. *phew* I may be a simple minded antipodean….but am I mistaken in thinking that this is the most ridiculous system of electing a leader since a lawful wife squeezed out a genetic heir? For F***s sake! Let the party pick their leader and then vote for the party whose policies impress you. Is that so difficult?
Answers genuinely considered.
arizaphale’s last blog post..See Ya Suckers!!!!
by Jason
12 Feb 2008 at 16:57
I’m sure you’ve seen the “Yes We Can” video about Barack Obama, but have you seen the equivalent John McCain video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gwqEneBKUs
by CDV
12 Feb 2008 at 17:08
That’s freakin’ hilarious, J. Have you seen his daughter’s blog? It’s actually pretty good and she’s hot in that scary blond Republican kind of captain of the cheerleaders kind of way.
by Nathan B.
12 Feb 2008 at 18:39
Those are the best kind of Republicans.