My pet theory regarding the demise of the Neanderthals is that they were the victim of our Paleolithic ancestors’ more murderous impulses. I know that this sort of flies in the face of the shiny happy sentiment of my post last week regarding the inherent ‘goodness’ of human nature, but I’m nothing if not idiosyncratic.
This theory, let’s call it the genocide hypothesis, isn’t a very good hypothesis in the sense that there is neither much published data nor archaeological evidence to support it. But then I’m not a very good scientist – just ask my post-doctoral supervisor.
However, a shred of evidence for the genocide hypothesis turned up this week with the publication of a paper in the latest issue of the Journal of Anthropological Sciences. (thanks to Jams of The Poor Mouth for the tip). Their study, led by Fernando Rozzi of CNRS in Paris, describes a reevaluation of human remains found in the French countryside in the late 1920s. Rozzi and his colleagues reassessed the dating of the bones as well as their taxonomy. They found that among the predominantly human remains, one of the bones – a portion of a mandible – is likely from a Neanderthal child. The sexy bit is that this jawbone was probably cut to remove flesh (including the tongue) and that the cut marks are similar to those used by our human ancestors at the time to butcher deer carcasses.
The authors propose that this juvenile Neanderthal jawbone provides some support for the idea that, in at least one case, our ancestors used Neanderthal children
for ceremonial purposes or even ate them. In an interview with London’s Observer (which predictably opted for a glamorously gruesome headline) Rozzi takes this further, suggesting that thus orivudes evidence of cannibalism by Paleolithic humans. In the same article, Professor Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum in London suggests that the Rozzi paper indicates that there were violent interactions between humans and Neanderthals and adds “to the evidence that competition from modern humans probably contributed to Neanderthal extinction.” It certainly isn’t a major leap to imagine that when times got tough, when the hunting and gathering business was in recession so to speak, that our human ancestors would turn to whatever happened to be around that would fill their stomachs.
However, as is the case with many archaeological reconstructions, there is some room for alternative interpretations. The authors themselves recognize that the ‘cannibalism’ hypothesis has some holes, stating that the remains may not in fact be from a Neanderthal child, but from a human child and that their may have been more anatomical variation in modern humans from this period. In previous reports, a fair amount of this variability in skeletal morphology in both humans and Neanderthals has been reported.
My go to guy on all things Neanderthal, Will Banks, directed me to John Hawks’ in depth critique on this paper. Hawks points out a number of the flaws in both the study design and the conclusions. The biggest issue seems to surround the dating of the remains, specifically that these remains are from a time that Neanderthals has basically disappeared from this part of Europe. This raises some major questions regarding the identification of the sample and the authors conclusions and raises the unfortunate fact that anthropology and archaeology are far from exact sciences.
And bear in mind that I would like to believe that this report is evidence of human genocide on the Neanderthals. I’m just hesitant to jump aboard the cannibalism bandwagon in this case.
If you’ll allow a bit of allegory, I was talking about this with some friends after dinner last night and one of them made a good analogy. If future denizens of the earth were doing archaeological digs around what used to be the west side of Milwaukee, say around what was formerly known as ‘North 25th Street‘, they might have stumbled on some remains that would indicate that our species in the late 20th century had a penchant for violent murder and cannibalism. But one set of remains does not necessarily speak for a society in general. The same holds true for this set of remains – as tempting as it is to do so – it would be dangerous to draw broad conclusions regarding the behavior of Paleolithic man based on chewed up jawbone.
——————————
Image credits:
Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds‘ outstanding “Abattoir Blues/Lyre of Orpheus” is available from
.
Popularity: 22% [?]

Stumble Upon
Del.icio.us
Buzz















by Monty
25 May 2009 at 18:35
One of em Paleolithic humans’s descendant currently resides in Austria.
I believe his name is Joseph Fritzel.
Montys last blog post..The Death of Chivalry.
by headbang8
25 May 2009 at 18:39
Ugh. Grunt. Ugh. Grunt grunt. Hooo. Grunt grunt. Snarl. Grunt grunt grunt. AAAARGH. Chomp. Slurp. Burp. Dessert?
headbang8s last blog post..The Bishop Has a Headache
by suzer
25 May 2009 at 20:29
I’d wouldn’t disregard your theory. To be simple, it is survival of the fittest, right? Anyway I guess I don’t have a hugely intelligent answer…I’m tired.
suzers last blog post..Toyota Supra Aerotop for Sale
by JChevais
25 May 2009 at 20:45
Didn’t I read somewhere that Tazmanians (up to the 1700s) loved to wage war with each other and that the spoils of war was the priviledge of eating the losing war party?…
Yum.
by The Unbearable Banishment
25 May 2009 at 22:18
I’ve never wanted to eat my children, although I was on a plane once and there was this screaming kid…
The Unbearable Banishments last blog post..bruce works hard for all that money
by arizaphale
25 May 2009 at 22:20
Suzer: Tired? What, have you been out ‘whooping it up’ in
li’l ole Adelaide?
I once had this great picture book called ‘Motel of the Mysteries’ in which future archeologists uncovered a ‘tomb’ (motel complex) complete with sarcophagus (bath), a sacred urn (toilet) and a communication device for speaking to the Gods(telephone…or was it the telly? can’t remember). The tomb was called Toot N’ Cmon.
Also, my dad always wondered what archeologists in the future might make of a drive in movie car park…all those ridges.
Just sayin.
arizaphales last blog post..SOOC Saturday: Aliens Exist
by Cat
26 May 2009 at 00:19
Whatcha talkin’ about, AFM? Around here in Georgia we all know that neanderthals never existed and the earth is only 6 thousand years old. How do we know so much more than you sciency folk? Duh, the Bible told us so!
Cats last blog post..Daddy
by Jacob
26 May 2009 at 01:07
I don’t doubt that our ancestors had something to do with the extinction of Neaderthals. After all, we’ve been such a great force of extinction throughout our history, but I always thought that climate change may have done as much if not more to bring about their demise. They seemed to be cold weather specialists. When the earth warmed and gave our ancestors access to their lands, we out-competed them. Just another case of a generalist outcompeting a specialist during a change in environment.
However, I don’t think eating a Neaderthal should qualify as cannibalism. After all, they’ve been unable to find any proof that there was any interbreeding and you know good and well human males are going to stick their wienies in anything they get a chance with. To me, it’s not cannibalism if you’re eating another species. That’s just being a carnivore. If we suddenly found a population of Neanderthals living in some arctic backwater, I’d be willing to gnaw on one of their hams, as long as it was cooked and seasoned well.
And I don’t think humans eating Neanderthals is a stretch. It was a pretty common trait in places like New Guinea and New Zealand once, in one culture eating your dead was a sign of respect. In others it just meant that you lost. If early humans didn’t consider the Neanderthals to be the same as them, I could easily see them preying on Neanderthals much like monkeys and primates are on the menu in many places where they’re native wild animals.
Jacobs last blog post..A New Camera
by yellojkt
26 May 2009 at 09:12
I’m a proponent of the theory that Neandertals interbreed with humans until the point they were no longer independent species. There isn’t much scientific support for this, but it would explain the ethnic distinctness of the Basque.
yellojkts last blog post..Memorial Day Mind Mush
by admin
26 May 2009 at 13:27
Monty – You’re a descendant of Paleolithic humans as well, ever have a twinge for a human stew?
Headbang – Is that German?
Suzer – Yep, that’s the one. But the best theory is that it was simple competition. Homo sapiens was better equipped to deal with their environment than Homo neandertalis
JChev – Cannibalism is not an uncommon phenomena in human history, so I guess it isn’t much of a stretch to assume that we’ve been doing it for the breadth of our existence.
TUB – See that’s what these guys would have done, eaten someone else’s kid.
Ariza – What’s a drive in movie?
Cat – Yeah, they still eat their young down in South Georgia as well.
Jacob – I don’t know if you saw the interview I did with Will Banks a while back, click on his name in the post and it will take you there. That’s the most accepted current hypothesis – just a simple out-comptetition hypothesis. Probably had little to do with climate, though. Resource acquisition, probs.
I almost made the same distinction re: cannibalism in the post. Nice to find a fellow pedant.
Yello – That hypothesis has been pretty thoroughly ruled out using DNA analysis. There are still a few folks who are hanging on to the idea of interbreeding, but the preponderence of the evidence suggests that if interbreeding occured then progeny were sterile or just didn’t make it until today.
by zayzayem
26 May 2009 at 14:31
Perhaps there’s a little bit of Morlock in all of us?
I wouldn’t necessarily say that violent altercations mean that homo sapiens waged a thoughtful genocide against the Neandertal. It would be a rather bleak genesis of our species though.
I’d more favour that inter-species violence (and inherent H. sapiens’ superiority) could have led to a decline in Neanderthal enough that they became susceptable to other extinction factors (think Tassie Devils and DFTD).
zayzayems last blog post..More than medicine
by LiteralDan
26 May 2009 at 15:22
I fail to see how one gnawed-on jawbone doesn’t DEMAND that we extrapolate our guesses across all of human evolution.
We don’t have time for anything more complicated– what do you think this is?? Let’s let science move on to finding out how how to melt away these extra pounds!
Should I, perhaps, stop eating all these delicious Neanderthals that time forgot (but I didn’t)? Once you pop, you can’t stop! How could I go back to commoners food??
LiteralDans last blog post..Don’t you have some Memorializing to do?
by Casey
26 May 2009 at 15:30
I like the sound of this: The Hominid Homicide Hypothesis
by Monty
26 May 2009 at 18:18
Ah shit. I shoulda seen that coming.
Montys last blog post..The Death of Chivalry.
by headbang8
26 May 2009 at 18:25
Not it’s not German. I just took my newly developed frontal lobes on an outing.
headbang8s last blog post..Photo Friday: Shiny
by Gwen
26 May 2009 at 22:42
You’ve put into words what has bothered me for a long time. I always thought it was faulty reasoning for scientists to draw broad conclusions about behaviors based on a few finds at a dig site. I always thought, “well what if they’re finding an anomaly? How can one find be representative of an entire culture?”
Gwens last blog post..The Five People You Fuck In Heaven
by Gypsy
27 May 2009 at 03:04
I’m pretty sure there was a zombie apocalypse. I know there’d probably be bite marks on the resulting bones, but still… blame zombies.
Gypsys last blog post..68 going on 28
by NATUI
27 May 2009 at 08:31
Very interesting post. I would be willing to bet that if the cannibalism were not out of necessity, it was also a form of psychological warfare. What better way to run someone out of town than to kill and cook their kids? I know I’d head for the hills. And beyond.
NATUIs last blog post..A Lesson In Decisiveness
by heather
27 May 2009 at 13:43
Ah, Milwaukee. I am associated with the criminal defense lawyer in that case. There are things that I wish I didn’t know.
It makes vegetarianism seem like a good choice.
heathers last blog post..The Quiet
by zayzayem
28 May 2009 at 01:32
Oh, Casey, I love the HHH. Excellent ring to it.
I wonder if they will attempt to adapt this into the next edition of the Paleolithic diet?
zayzayems last blog post..Pandemic panic epidemic
by we_be_toys
29 May 2009 at 00:22
While I don’t think the Paleos were systematically eating their big hairy cousins, like you said, when times are tough, that tough Neanderthal starts looking like something to chew on!
Loved Arizaphale’s “Toot N Cmon” scenario! It’s all in how you look at it, right?
we_be_toyss last blog post..Invasion of the Bodysnatchers (and a few recipes)
Pingback
by You and me baby ain’t nothin’ but mammals | a free man
19 May 2010 at 21:20
[...] is clear that they were intelligent.” Maybe even more civilised than our human ancestors who very possibly killed them and ate their Neandertal cousins and may have wiped them off the face of the planet [...]